Why Humanoid Robots May Be the Wrong Bet for Industrial Automation - Automation World
Read the article and explore its original source.

Article
Get the latest news and updates
Related
AI Vision System Uses Synthetic Data to Master Food Inspection Variability
Predictive Maintenance Success with MES
Why Effective Power and Energy Management is Crucial in Automation
Which Ignition Edition Is Right For Your System?
Leaders relevant to this article:
B&R Industrial Automation
Bishop-Wisecarver Corp
HEIDENHAIN Corporation
Mitsubishi Electric Automation, Inc.
SEW-EURODRIVE Inc
View All Companies >
Trending
How Automation Addresses Industry’s Worker Shortage While Improving Safety and Job Satisfaction
Ultra-Wideband as a Backbone for Manufacturing Efficiency
How Contactless Couplers Change the Approach to Industrial Power and Data Transmission
Sponsored Picks David Brandt
Feb. 26, 2026
5 min read
Key Highlights
The human body evolved for survival, not industry. The high center of gravity, complex joints and 200+ degrees of freedom make humanoid robots less reliable than purpose-built alternatives. Existing safety standards like ISO 13849-1 demand high performance levels to prevent dangerous falls, yet few humanoid manufacturers provide credible stability or reliability data to meet them. Specialized robots, such as AMRs, cobots, SCARA and delta robots, already prove that purpose-built design delivers safer, more scalable automation without the engineering compromises of the human form factor. Humanoid robots promise revolutionary automation, but their complexity, instability and safety gaps may outweigh the appeal of human-shaped machines.
David Brandt
Feb. 26, 2026
5 min read
Key Highlights
Evidence and editorial ownership
Request a correctionOriginal source
Automationworld · automationworld.com
Published March 1, 2026
New robots, industry moves, and funding in your weekly robotics briefing.
Unsubscribe anytime.